Economic and Community Development Department
|
On Target?
|
PM #1: Total jobs created (est.)
|
√
|
PM #2: Total jobs retained (est.)
|
√
|
Economic Revitalization Team
|
|
| PM #2: Percent of the 25 "opportunity sites" identified by the Industrial Lands Advisory Committee and referenced in HB 2011 (2003) certified as project-ready or developed |
√
|
PM #3: Number of new industrial sites / acres certified as "project ready"
|
|
Employment Department
|
|
PM #1: ENTERED EMPLOYMENT - % of job seekers who got a job with a new employer after registering with the Employment Department
|
√
|
| PM #2: EMPLOYMENT RETENTION - % of Job Seekers who were in employment two quarters after registering with the Employment Department |
√
|
| PM #3: COST PER PLACEMENT– total cost of B&ES programs divided by the total number of job seekers entered into employment after receiving services |
|
PM #18: CUSTOMER SERVICE - % of customers rating their satisfaction with the agency's customer service as "good" or "excellent": overall, timeliness, accuracy, helpfulness, expertise, availability of information
|
|
Department of Transportation
|
|
PM #20: Number of jobs sustained as a result of annual construction expenditures
|
√
|
PM #21: Percent of projects going to construction phase within 90 days of target date.
|
|
PM #24: Percent of ODOT contract dollars awarded to disadvantaged, minority, women, and emerging small businesses
|
|
Department of Land Conservation and Development
|
|
PM #1: Percent of cities that have an adequate supply of land for industrial and other employment needs to implement their local economic development plan
|
|
PM #3: Percent of cities that have updated the local plan to include reasonable cost estimates and funding plans for sewer and water systems
|
√
|
PM #4: Number of.industrial sites certified as "project ready" added each fiscal year
|
|
PM #5: Percent of urban areas with a population greater than 25,000 that have adopted transit supportive land use regulations
|
√
|
PM #6: Percent of urban areas that have updated the local plan to include reasonable cost estimates and funding plans for transportation facilities
|
√
|
PM #8: Percent of estuarine areas designated as "development management units" in 2000 that retain that designation
|
√
|
PM #9: Percent of urban areas that have updated buildable land inventories to account for natural resource and hazard areas
|
|
PM #10: Percent of farm land outside urban growth boundaries zoned for exclusive farm use in 1987 that retains that zoning
|
√
|
PM #11: Percent of forest land outside urban growth boundaries zoned in 1987 for forest or mixed farm/forest use that remains zoned for those uses
|
|
| Oregon University System |
|
| PM #14: Number of inventions disclosed per year |
√
|
| PM #15: License income per $100 million research expenditures per year |
√
|
| PM #16: The number of start-up/spin-off companies per $100 million research expenditures per year |
√
|
| PM #22: Percent of employed graduates working in Oregon |
|
| Department of Fish and Wildlife |
|
| PM #2: Personal income generated by wildlife watching activities |
|
| PM #3: Personal income generated by hunting activities |
|
| PM #9: Personal income generated from commercial fishery landings |
√
|
Oregon Liquor Control Commission
|
|
LMPM #2: License Processing Time - Average days from receipt of application to license issuance
|
√
|